Papers
arxiv:2609.38537

Systematically Exploring the Capabilities of GPT-6 Astra as Embodied Policies

Published on Sep 29
ยท Submitted by
Zekun Qi
on Oct 1
ยท Galbot Galbot
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

GPT-6 Astra demonstrates strong high-level embodied decision-making across manipulation, navigation, and locomotion tasks, but reveals a persistent gap between task planning and reliable low-level physical control, with substantial inference latency limiting real-time deployment.

GPT-6 Astra exhibits a remarkable ability to generate numerical robot actions, extending its role beyond high-level planning. To assess Astra's capabilities as general-purpose embodied policies, we conduct comprehensive evaluations across six domains, examining direct control, cooperation with learned policies, and feedback-driven adaptation. In gripper manipulation, Astra can correct task targets and prepare contact conditions for subsequent policy execution; hybrid control with ฯ€0.5 achieves 48% success on the evaluated RoboDojo subset. In dexterous manipulation, hybrid control achieves 50% success in ten experience-guided DexJoCo trials, while direct in-hand control struggles to coordinate finger contacts. In mobile manipulation, hybrid control reaches 38.7% success on the evaluated RoboCasa365. In navigation, Astra leads our local comparisons, reaching 92% success on RxR instruction following and 82% on HM3D object search, although search incurs substantial detours. In locomotion, dense motion-reference generation remains unreliable: none of five sequential attempts on a single obstacle course reaches the goal, despite improvements in stability and forward progress. In humanoid loco-manipulation, Astra exceeds baseline methods on 13 of 30 HumanoidBench tasks with pretrained whole-body controllers. These findings reveal a gap between useful task decisions and reliable physical control. Inference latency further constrains practical control: across 50 RoboDojo instances per condition, policy-assisted and direct control consume 624.8 million and 1.132 billion tokens. A 30-second locomotion run requires 250 model calls averaging 39.86 seconds each, with physics paused during inference.

Community

Paper submitter

Systematically Exploring the Capabilities of GPT-6 Astra as Embodied Policies

This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.

The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API

Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!

If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space

You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend

Thank you for sharing this systematic evaluation. Comparing direct numerical control with delegation to a learned controller helps identify which capabilities come from a general model and which depend on the execution stack. We discuss this connection to robot action interfaces and fixed-model adaptation through feedback and retained notes in the working revision of In-Context Learning for Robots: Methods and Applications (https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.36012). If the survey provides useful context for your research, we would appreciate your considering it as a reference. Thank you again!

Sign up or log in to comment

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.38537 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2609.38537 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 1

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.