TextVerifier: Seeing Beyond Recognition to Verify Chinese Text Rendering
Abstract
A target-conditioned verifier using Ideographic Description Sequences detects local Chinese text rendering errors and improves generation through reinforcement learning.
Text-to-image models increasingly generate readable Chinese text that still contains local rendering defects, such as a character with an extra or missing stroke or a malformed component. Such errors are invisible to OCR and vision-language models, which are trained for recognition and are therefore invariant to the very structural deviations that define a rendering error. We formalize text rendering verification as a target-conditioned problem: given a target character and an image crop, decide whether the crop is a correct rendering of that character. Our verifier TEXTVERIFIER feeds the text tower a character's Ideographic Description Sequence (IDS) rather than a single-character symbol, and is trained on 12.7M crop-IDS pairs plus label-free "same-character, different-quality" hard pairs sampled from the training trajectory of a text-region inpainting model. To evaluate this ability we build TEXTRENDERBENCH-ZH, the first per-character benchmark for generated Chinese text, annotating position, identity, and correctness for 7,358 characters. TEXTVERIFIER reaches an F1 of 0.844, far above OCR confidence (0.526), a general VLM (0.329), and TextPecker (0.590). Used as a per-character reward for Flow-GRPO post-training, it further reduces rendering errors, showing that its score can both detect and correct errors.
Community
đ Readable doesnât always mean correctly rendered. Meet TextVerifier, our model for detecting subtle errors in generated Chinese textâfrom missing strokes to malformed componentsâthat OCR and vision-language models can overlook. By representing characters through Ideographic Description Sequences (IDS), TextVerifier learns to assess their visual structure. We also introduce TextRenderBench-ZH, a benchmark with 7,358 individually annotated characters, where TextVerifier achieves 0.844 F1, outperforming OCR confidence (0.526), a general VLM (0.329), and TextPecker (0.590). Beyond evaluation, its scores serve as per-character rewards for Flow-GRPO post-training, helping reduce rendering errors. Weâre excited to share this step toward more reliable Chinese text generationâfeedback is welcome! đ¤
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- Decompose Radicals, Then Reward: Fine-Grained Inspection for Accurate Chinese Text Rendering (2026)
- GlyphAnchor: Enhancing Visual Text Rendering via Position-Anchored Glyph Priors (2026)
- Efficient Scene-Text Refinement via Pixel-Space Grouped Image Generation (2026)
- Enhanced Video Text Editing with Trajectory-Aligned Glyph Rendering (2026)
- TextRefine: Improving Textual Fidelity, Spatial Placement, and Glyph Rendering for Text Editing in Product Posters (2026)
- UltraText Bench: A Comprehensive Bilingual Benchmark for Evaluating Visual Text Rendering in Image Generation (2026)
- TextVBench: Evaluating Text Rendering and Preservation in Video Generation (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2610.19551 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper