MAServeBench: Benchmarking Multi-Agent LLM Serving Systems with Hierarchical Collaboration Workloads
Abstract
MAServeBench evaluates LLM serving and hardware by modeling multi-agent collaboration as a configurable workload dimension with reproducible dependency traces.
Large language model (LLM)-based multi-agent systems (MAS) coordinate specialized agents to solve complex tasks, turning each user request into interdependent model and tool operations. Unlike independent requests, these operations become ready at different times and consume evolving context as agents coordinate and exchange results. This creates changing patterns of concurrency, computation, and memory demand that can expose different bottlenecks in LLM serving hardware. Yet benchmarking these effects requires capturing the collaboration rules that generate serving workloads, beyond the requests observed during execution. We present MAServeBench, a benchmark that treats multi-agent collaboration as a configurable dimension of serving workloads for LLM serving and hardware evaluation. Its composable stages capture how agents coordinate and exchange context in documented MAS workflows, enabling native executions to generate different workloads even when task inputs and tools remain unchanged. Hierarchical Semantic Traces preserve realized operations and dependencies for reproducible comparisons of legal release constraints at fixed work. Task-linked measurements connect these workloads to serving execution and GPU/NPU hardware behavior, revealing why serving efficiency does not always translate into timely task completion. The benchmark code is available at https://github.com/ShengxuanQiu/MAServeBench.
Community
Multi-agent collaboration fundamentally reshapes LLM serving workloads through dynamic dependencies, synchronization, and context sharing—beyond what conventional request-level benchmarks can capture. We introduce MAServeBench, a benchmark featuring composable hierarchical collaboration patterns and dependency-preserving Semantic Traces for reproducible serving evaluation and architecture simulation. Our GPU/NPU studies reveal how collaboration affects compute efficiency, KV cache pressure, and end-to-end task performance. We hope this work helps guide the design of next-generation serving systems and hardware for agentic AI. Feedback and discussions are very welcome!
This is an automated message from the Librarian Bot. I found the following papers similar to this paper.
The following papers were recommended by the Semantic Scholar API
- AgentReplay: Token-Wise Trace Replay Is Essential for Fair Serving System Performance Benchmarking (2026)
- CoMemBench: Benchmarking Collaborative Memory Boundaries across Multi-Agent Workflow Topologies (2026)
- Coda: Exploiting Admission Flexibility for Coding-Agent Serving (2026)
- Serving a Revisable World: Versioned Execution for Interruptible Agents (2026)
- Semantics, Workflows, and Infrastructure: Understanding Agent Serving at Production Scale (2026)
- AgentPerfBench: A Benchmarking and Evaluation Suite for Inference Performance of Agentic LLMs (2026)
- SparseEngine: Sparse-First Inference Engine (2026)
Please give a thumbs up to this comment if you found it helpful!
If you want recommendations for any Paper on Hugging Face checkout this Space
You can directly ask Librarian Bot for paper recommendations by tagging it in a comment: @librarian-bot recommend
Get this paper in your agent:
hf papers read 2610.40293 Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash Models citing this paper 0
No model linking this paper
Datasets citing this paper 0
No dataset linking this paper
Spaces citing this paper 0
No Space linking this paper
Collections including this paper 0
No Collection including this paper