Papers
arxiv:2611.13410

SteerDistill: Quantizing LLM Agents via Closed-Loop Teacher Steering

Published on Nov 10
· Submitted by
Xiangyu Li
on Nov 12
#2 Paper of the day
Authors:
,
,
,
,
,

Abstract

Low-bit quantized LLM agents can recover much of their task success through closed-loop guidance from a full-precision teacher, followed by unassisted student training on corrected and reference turns.

Low-bit quantization reduces the inference cost of LLM agents but can compromise task success. Examining failed rollouts, we find that quantized agents overlook task requirements or environmental conditions, producing environment transitions that diverge from successful full-precision references. Correcting these behavioral divergences remains difficult: offline data may miss the student's failure contexts, while its own rollouts may provide few correct responses in those contexts. We introduce SteerDistill, a quantization-aware distillation method in which a full-precision teacher guides the student to revise failed responses and iteratively refines its guidance using feedback from student execution. This closed-loop teacher steering produces locally verified behavioral corrections. We internalize these corrections by training the student without guidance to match the steered student's predictions at corrected turns and the full-precision teacher's at other turns, enabling unassisted inference. Across five agentic benchmarks and three models, SteerDistill exceeds the strongest quantized baseline by 1.67--2.18 points in average score under W4A16 and stays within one point of BF16. On τ^2-Bench, it outperforms QeRL by 1.84 percentage points in success rate using 67% fewer training GPU hours and produces shorter successful trajectories than the quantized baselines.

Community

Paper submitter

SteerDistill: sub-4-bit LLM agents.

A quantized agent can miss a task requirement and fail the whole task. SteerDistill trains it to avoid these mistakes through closed-loop teacher steering.

A frozen BF16 teacher guides student retries and refines its guidance using execution feedback. Context distillation internalizes the locally verified corrections. The student then runs alone, without a teacher or steering prompts. Both start from the same BF16 checkpoint.

At W4A16, average scores stay within one point of BF16 across three models and five agent benchmarks. At W2A16, SteerDistill achieves the highest average score among the tested quantized baselines on Qwen3-8B.

Project & cases · Code · Paper

Treating the quantization loss as behavioral divergence rather than a generic accuracy gap is a really clear framing. The BFCL diagnostic explains a lot for me: unguided retries find a correct action at only 9.6% of divergent turns, while closed-loop teacher steering lifts that to 82.3%, which shows why plain on-policy QAD has so little to learn from. I run quantized models on a small homelab, so the W2A16 margin of 3.39 points over On-Policy QAD is the result I'd most like to try. Curious: for failed rollouts without a successful teacher reference, which get no corrections, do you know roughly how large that share was per benchmark, and whether that is where the remaining gap to BF16 sits?

Sign up or log in to comment

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2611.13410 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2611.13410 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2611.13410 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.